Theological Comparisons

What does Scripture actually teach? Biblical analysis of every major soteriology. Calvinism compared to Arminianism, Catholicism, Molinism, Open Theism, and more.

15 Comparisons
01

The 101-Day Series: Grace vs Works

Reformed grace compared to Arminian synergism across 101 life scenarios. The fundamental divide: does salvation depend on God's sovereign will or human choice? Which framework does Scripture affirm?

EPHESIANS 2:8-9
02

Calvinism vs Arminianism

The historical divide between Calvinism and Arminianism traced to its roots. Five points of each framework examined. The question that separates them: is God's will or man's will ultimate in salvation?

ROMANS 9:11-18
03

Monergism vs Synergism

Monergism (God alone works in salvation) vs synergism (God and man cooperate). The doctrinal machinery behind every disagreement. Which framework aligns with the depravity of man and the power of grace?

JOHN 6:44
04

Predestination vs Foreknowledge

God's predestination compared to God's mere foreknowledge. The question: did God choose based on what He would foreknow, or did He choose sovereignly and foreknew as a consequence?

ROMANS 8:29-30
05

Calvinism vs Molinism

Calvinism compared to Molinism: does God decree what will happen, or does He know counterfactuals (what would happen in every possible circumstance) and work through those? Which protects God's sovereignty?

ISAIAH 46:9-10
06

Calvinism vs Open Theism

Calvinism compared to Open Theism: does God know the future, or does the future remain open? If God doesn't know what will happen, can He be sovereign? Can He be God?

1 PETER 1:20
07

Reformed vs Catholic Soteriology

Reformed vs Catholic soteriology compared: justification by faith alone vs faith plus works, imputed vs infused righteousness, and the role of grace, merit, and human cooperation in salvation.

ROMANS 3:28
08

Every Decision Point

A systematic comparison of ten crucial theological decision points. At each one, man-centered theology sides with man, while God-centered theology sides with God. The Scripture verdict is unambiguous.

ROMANS 9:16
09

Reformed vs Lutheran

Lutheran and Reformed theology agree that a dead man cannot raise himself — both confess the bound will, the gift of faith, and sovereign election. So why do they part? A charitable look at the closest cousin in Protestant theology, and the monergism that will not finish its own sentence.

JOHN 1:12-13
10

Single vs Double Predestination

If God chose to save some, did He choose to pass over the rest? The crux theologorum — why some and not others — that Lutheranism leaves a holy wound and the Reformed answer without making God the author of sin. The asymmetry is written into the very grammar of Romans 9.

ROMANS 9:22-23
11

Can the Saved Be Lost?

Lutherans say a regenerate soul can fall away and lose saving faith. The Reformed answer that a corpse which could not raise itself cannot re-bury itself — and that the keeping was never your grip on God, but His grip on you.

JOHN 10:28-29
12

Reformed vs. Eastern Orthodox

The Christian East holds the highest goal in all of Christendom — theosis, real participation in the life of God — and rests the first step on a will it admits is wounded. The whole quarrel reduces to one question on the operating table: how dead is the patient?

EPHESIANS 2:1
13

Reformed vs. Wesleyan

John Wesley believed in human inability more deeply than most who quote him — and then built a holiness machine that set the self back on top of the mountain. Christian perfection, the second blessing, and the Quadrilateral: the doctrines Arminius never taught, and the cruelest place to put the self.

1 JOHN 1:8
14

Reformed vs. Provisionism

The system of Leighton Flowers and Soteriology 101 is the only soteriology that rejects both Calvin's effectual grace and Arminius's prevenient grace. To stand, it must deny the sinner is dead — and if a word of information can raise a corpse, Calvary answered a problem that never existed.

1 JOHN 5:1
15

Reformed vs. Hyper-Calvinism

Most people who reject Calvinism have only ever met its shadow — a God who might not love them, a gospel with no welcome, a fatalism that makes evangelism pointless. Hyper-Calvinism denies the free offer of the gospel and the duty of all to believe — and it is the same loss of nerve as Arminianism, committed in the opposite direction.

MATTHEW 11:28